Skip to main content
ai coding automation open-source workflow

Multi-Agent Orchestration Patterns: Getting AI Agents to Actually Cooperate

Practical patterns for chaining specialized AI coding agents into a pipeline — planner, coder, reviewer — that produces reviewable output instead of chaos.

Codeberg-first

Ralph Workflow is free and open source. Inspect the primary repo on Codeberg before you install — or jump to the GitHub mirror.

One AI coding agent is good. Two can be chaos. The difference is whether you have a clean handoff between them.

Most developers start with a single agent and hit the same wall: Claude Code is great at reasoning but the context window gets expensive. DeepSeek is fast and cheap but misses edge cases. Codex CLI has solid tool integration but you're still babysitting the loop.

The answer isn't picking the best model. It's making them work together with clear phase boundaries.

The Pipeline Pattern That Actually Works

Instead of asking one model to do everything, split the work into phases where each agent owns a specific job and hands off a reviewable artifact:

  1. Plan — Strong reasoning model defines the scope, acceptance criteria, and what "done" looks like
  2. Build — Fast coding model implements against that spec in an isolated workspace
  3. Verify — A second model (or the same model with different prompting) reviews the diff, runs checks, and flags anything sketchy
  4. Fix — Targeted corrections on anything the review caught, with a tight loop ceiling so it doesn't drift

The key isn't more agents. It's that each phase produces something the next phase can actually judge.

This is cost arbitrage applied to AI coding workflows: the expensive model only runs where reasoning adds value. The cheap model handles the bulk of implementation where speed matters more.

Configuring the Pipeline with Ralph Workflow

Ralph Workflow lets you define this pipeline in a single TOML file. Each phase gets its own agent, model, and validation gate — so you're not copy-pasting between terminal windows at 2 AM.

[phases.planning]
agent = "claude-code"
model = "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"

[phases.development]
agent = "codex-cli"
model = "gpt-5"

[phases.review]
agent = "claude-code"
model = "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
prompt = "review for bugs, edge cases, and security issues"

[phases.fix]
agent = "claude-code"
model = "claude-haiku-4-20250514"

Ralph Workflow handles the workspace isolation, the handoff artifacts, and the stop-conditions between phases. You define what each phase should produce. It makes sure the next phase actually receives it.

Start Small, Then Compose

You don't need all four phases on day one. Start with two:

  • One agent builds. Another agent reviews the diff.
  • If the diff is small and the checks are green, you merge.

That alone catches most of the silent failures that happen when a single agent both writes and certifies its own output.

Once that loop is clean, add planning and targeted fix phases. The pipeline grows with your trust in it.

Getting Started

pip install ralph-workflow
ralph init my-project
ralph run --task "Build a REST API for user authentication"

Primary repo (Codeberg): codeberg.org/RalphWorkflow/Ralph-Workflow Mirror (GitHub): github.com/Ralph-Workflow/Ralph-Workflow Docs: ralphworkflow.com/docs


This content was generated as part of the Ralph Workflow content pipeline. Content is reviewed before deployment.

Best evaluator path

Turn the idea into a real overnight test, not another saved tab.

Codeberg-first: open the primary repo, choose one bounded backlog task, run it tonight, and ask one question tomorrow morning — would I merge this? GitHub stays available as the mirror.

Open the primary Codeberg repo

Read the public source before you install anything.

Pick a first task

Use the guide to choose a bounded backlog item that is honest to review.

Install and run Ralph Workflow

Keep the machine awake, then decide in the morning whether the diff is good enough to merge.