When Your AI Coding Agent Gets Stuck: How to Stop the Infinite Tool Loop

You start an unattended coding run, walk away, and come back three hours later to find your agent burned 200,000 tokens calling grep on the same file. It found nothing the first time, nothing the tenth time, and kept going anyway.

This is not a rare edge case. It is the most common silent failure pattern in agentic coding, and almost nobody writes about it because "the run finished" sounds like success even when 90% of the budget was tool-loop thrash.

What a tool loop looks like

A real log snippet from a Claude Code run that should have been a 15-minute refactoring task:

[TOOL CALL] grep -rn "validate_order" src/
[TOOL RESULT] No matches found
[TOOL CALL] grep -rn "validate_order" src/
[TOOL RESULT] No matches found
[TOOL CALL] grep -rn "validate_order" src/
...
(repeats 47 times before the run times out)

The agent's reasoning chain collapsed. It knew what it wanted to find, couldn't find it, and instead of reformulating — it re-tried. Workflow frameworks that lack a phase gate have no lever to stop this.

Why agents get stuck

The root cause is almost never the model. It's the structural absence of:

A bounded search horizon. The agent has no rule that says "after N unsuccessful tool calls, stop and reassess."

Phase-level verification. The agent keeps running blind because nobody checks whether the last phase actually succeeded before starting the next one.

No external circuit breaker. A human isn't watching, and the runtime doesn't enforce "exit the phase if tool calls return nothing useful N times in a row."

The phrase "agent is stuck" gets used loosely, but the mechanism is almost always the same: a valid-seeming tool call that should have been reformulated, except the model's attention window keeps it anchored to the original approach.

Three fixes, ranked by leverage

1. Workflow-level phase gates (highest leverage)

Don't let the agent run open-ended. Split the run into explicit phases — analysis, planning, implementation, verification — and require each phase to produce a concrete artifact before the next one starts.

This is the core idea behind Ralph Workflow's phase-gate architecture. The analysis phase writes ANALYSIS.md. The planning phase consumes it and writes PLAN.md. If analysis returns zero findings, the planning phase never starts. The circuit breaker is structural, not probabilistic.

2. Bounded tool loops with repetition detection

Even within a phase, you can catch the loop. A simple wrapper that tracks identical tool calls:

if last_3_tool_calls_identical():
emit("STOP: pattern detected — same tool call repeated 3x")
switch_to_recovery_phase()

This is a 20-line addition to any agent runtime. The hard part is not the detection — it's what happens after. You need a recovery phase that exists and knows how to re-plan from the artifact produced by the last successful phase.

3. Token budget per phase, not per run

Most coding agents have a total-run budget. Move that granularity down. Give the analysis phase 15K tokens, the planning phase 25K, and the implementation phase 80K. If analysis burns 15K without producing a useful artifact, the run fails fast instead of failing expensively.

What this means for tool choice

Most AI coding tools on the market are built for attended use — you start a run, watch it, and intervene when something looks wrong. That works for 30-minute tasks.

For overnight runs, multi-hour projects, and tasks you genuinely want to walk away from, the question is not "which model is smartest" but "does the workflow itself enforce sane stopping conditions."

If your agent can call the same failing tool 50 times without anyone noticing until the bill arrives, the problem is not the agent. It's the absence of a workflow that knows when to stop.

Try it on your own backlog. Pick one task that outgrew a single Claude Code session. Write a one-paragraph spec, run it through a phase-gated workflow tonight, and ask yourself tomorrow morning: would you merge the output?

Start here: First-task guide →

Primary repo (Codeberg): RalphWorkflow/Ralph-Workflow ★
GitHub mirror: Ralph-Workflow

Ralph Workflow is free and open source. It runs with the coding agents you already use on your own machine.